True, it's the one that outlasted the other by 9.4%, thanks for pointing out the obvious! Plus, doing that on a smaller and lighter phone just makes it an even slightly better win.
It's a shame Apple doesn't upgrade their batteries more than 5% each year, while Xiaomi got these results through upgrading their batteries to one that is 25% bigger than in the previous model, using tech that will make that battery easily last 5 years.
Sadly Apple couldn't find space inside their new model to fit a battery that is more than 5% bigger than in the previous model, while being built on 2016 technology, effectively becoming obsolete 3x faster than the battery that is on the Xiaomi device. They wouldn't do that on purpose, would they? Of course not, they are environmentally friendly, and on top of that, always try to give their loyal customers the best of the best in terms of hardware!