With a simply monstrous 160W in PL1 mode, the old friend 14900HX produces simply shameful performance - just compare the CBR15 numbers of the previously reviewed models just last week... At the same time, the 160W 14900HX loses to the 33W 7840U from AMD in the Ray Trace 64 test from the AIDA64 package.
The screen is extremely mediocre. As usual, fake "240Hz" (actually a little faster than 100Hz). Extremely mediocre contrast (at this price we expect 1500:1+, no less). Color reproduction is only sRGB, not DCI-P3.
Again there is 1 TB4 port, while the cheaper HP Omen with the same 14900HX has 2 of them.
Morally outdated wifi chip - instead of BE200 ($23 - wi-fi7), AX211(wifi 6E).
RJ45 is not fast enough for 2024 - 5Gbps minimum required.
FHD webcam with 2.5k screen. What does it mean?
The noise is as usual high even under office load.
The top part with the keyboard gets very hot.
Well, to top it off, as always with such manufacturers, there is a damaged keyboard with a non-working numpad - the right arrow in place of insert, which immediately ruins blind, quick work with two hands. Why do they deliberately save on a full-fledged keyboard, reducing their sales immediately by several times? I don't understand...