Claiming the 1 iii demolished the Rog 5 in the speed test is a ridiculously exaggeration. It was a very minute lead.
Which also further makes it an EXCESSIVELY flawed and exaggerated claim to say this proves stock android is better. Just because of a tiny insignificant speed difference that won't even be noticed without a side by side comparison.
Oh it opens apps a tiny hair quicker so even though it lacks basic function and many logical useful additions it's so superior... hur dur....
Not mention you wanna see who wins in performance? Do a real performance test and watch the 1 iii fall far behind in throttling and battery.
Not to mention as well how much better the rog 5 is in speakers, headphones, many optimizations, multiple displays aspects besides 4k.... during the few moments the 1 iii decides to even let the display reach 4k, battery, pricing, availability, comparable in camera, etc, etc.